home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0795.doc
/
000085_owner-lightwave@webcom.com_Wed Jul 5 08:41:04 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-08-06
|
2KB
Received: by webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA253678864; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 08:41:04 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from netmail2.microsoft.com by webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA253528844; Wed, 5 Jul 1995 08:40:44 -0700
Received: by netmail2.microsoft.com (5.65/25-eef)
id AA29233; Wed, 5 Jul 95 09:15:07 -0700
Message-Id: <9507051615.AA29233@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Received: by netmail2 using fxenixd 1.0 Wed, 05 Jul 95 09:15:07 PDT
X-Msmail-Message-Id: 06637973
X-Msmail-Conversation-Id: 06637973
From: Kent Cedola <kentce@microsoft.com>
To: jgjones@usa.net, lightwave@webcom.com
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 95 08:40:14 TZ
Subject: RE: Windows NT 3.51?
X-Msxmtid: red-28-msg950705154348MTP[01.00.00]000000da-20255
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
| Anyone have any info comparing Windows NT 3.5 with the new 3.51 version?
| Any improvements in LW rendering times, or better memory use? Is it worth
| $89? (Seems a bit steep for a measly one one-hundreth of a whole number
| upgrade... :)
NT 3.51 is faster, smaller, contains some Win95 UI support (new
controls for example), new by file/directory NTFS compression, PPC
support and a bunch of other improvements.
-- Kent
--
Kent Cedola <kentce@microsoft.com> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com